home . about us . the magazine
April 2002  
 
   . editorial
archive contact us
   search   





• Editorial •

April 2002

Our recent plea for more staplers and deliverers has resulted in some new recruits and we would like to welcome Bridget Gray, Mrs Daynes and Eddie Smalls as staplers and Valerie Lowe as a new deliverer. Janet Smith has also volunteered to staple and deliver the Marlpit to her neighbours in Little Hautbois so extending our boundaries further. We are very grateful to them all. We are sad however to have to say goodbye to retiring stapler Mark Bowen and his team and retiring deliverer Andrea Morrey. Thank you all for your hard work for the community, it has been most appreciated. Our plea for further assistance continues and we still need another deliverer in Coltishall. Please contact an editor if you can help.

You may notice some changes this month with the introduction of a Contents in the magazine to help you find your favourite bits more quickly. You may well find the order rather different as well with regular articles and letters to the magazine near the front and the Clubs, Associations and Church news further to the back. We would welcome your comments on how you as readers like to see the layout of your magazine and what you like to see included. Comments to the editors please.

Finally it is the time of year when the little brown envelope is attached to your Marlpit. The magazine is free but we do rely very much on your voluntary donations to help with the running and publication costs. Obviously the paper, ink, etc all cost money as does the continuing running costs of the printer.

Page 1 of 6



Volunteers will be calling to collect the envelopes and your donations some time between 13th - 27th April. They will be carrying identification. We hope you will feel able to contribute something towards the Marlpit this year. Thank you.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Sand and Gravel Extraction

Two of your editors were among the many people who attended a meeting arranged by Horstead with Stanninghall Parish Council on 2 March 2002. Firstly we would compliment the Chairman, John Neville, for the excellent way in which he maintained control and discipline over what was clearly an emotive subject. For those unable to attend we have summarised, to the best of our ability, the main points of the meeting.

Planning Application Ref. ENV/C/2001/5005 by Longwater Gravel at Grange Farm, Horstead

Mr Littleboy, Managing Director of Longwater Gravel addressed the meeting and confirmed:
• 500,000 tonnes to be extracted over a 10 year period.
• Estimated 26 lorry movements per day for 6 days per week.
• Intention to transport all gravel to Costessey, lorries would achieve this by driving to Horstead and turning right at the Recruiting Sergeant junction then proceed towards Norwich and the outer ring road.
• Advised that an alternative route through Hainford was under discussion.
• Confirmed there would be a mobile crushing plant on site from time to time.

Page 2 of 6



Intended Planning Application by Tarmac at Norwich Road, Horstead

Mr Gumby of Tarmac addressed the meeting and confirmed:
• Estimated 7½ million tonnes of gravel to be extracted over 20 year period from this 100 Hectare site.
• Estimated 150 lorry movements per day.
• Concrete mixing will take place on the site with cement brought in.
• There will be a permanent 5m drop in the land level.
• This would be Tarmac's main supply in Norfolk.
• Work to be carried out in 8 phases with 3 phases active at any one time.
• 90% of traffic is planned to go to Norwich.
• Tarmac intend to have a second public exhibition (no date yet) and give reasonable notice of this meeting.
• Tarmac expect to plant 40,000 trees and hedging to provide a screen.

Matters raised in response/general comment at the meeting

The anticipated periods of extraction are not guaranteed and can reasonably be extended.

Neither the lorry movements (as maximum movements) nor the routes taken will be guaranteed.
There are no specific planned road improvements/pedestrian safety measures or the like to accommodate the proposals.

Previous Tarmac sites were conceded by them as having tree screening of immature deciduous trees that for most of the life of the extraction would not successfully provide a screen.

Page 3 of 6



It was alleged that from the Tarmac Scheme, the Landowner, Trafford Estates, will receive £1/tonne for the gravel extracted i.e. £7½ million. It was confirmed that whilst the general public in the surrounding areas would undoubtedly suffer the inconvenience and disruption of the extraction the benefit to the community was £0.

The meeting was informed that planning permission has been granted for extraction of gravel from a site at Spixworth although this is not yet operational. No details of the amount to be extracted, period of extraction or anticipated lorry movements were available.

The criteria for approval of gravel extraction is to maintain a landbank of gravel extraction sufficient to provide reserves of 7 years supply.

Comment

The motivation for extraction of gravel is profit

It would be unreasonable to expect to restrict a landowner's right to make a profit from his land.

What is also unreasonable is that if in the making of that profit it was to the detriment and in disregard of the community in the surrounding area.

What is the Planning Authority Policy?

Evidently there are 'development policies' already in place that enable the Planners to reject a proposed scheme on environmental grounds e.g. the proposal for gravel extraction at

Page 4 of 6



Thurning (see March Marlpit) rejected on the grounds that it would damage the landscape amenity, wildlife and roads (no mention of the direct effect on people).
Whether the Planners choose to comply with these 'Policies' seems to be largely influenced by this 'requirement' to maintain a landbank reserve of gravel extraction sufficient for a 7 year supply.

Is it simply 'pot luck' as to how the reserves stand when you apply?

What is the effect on the surrounding area and the people who live there?
The inconvenience to the local population from gravel extraction activities includes:

Near proximity: Light pollution - working after dark
  Noise pollution - site workings, plant, grinding of gravel, lorry movement
  Air pollution - dust and dirt
 
Adjacent areas: As above but to a lesser extent
  Other - Danger and damage from lorry traffic and increased traffic generally
For those living next to an extraction quarry there is also the 'blight' on their property values for which no compensation is available.

Have previous extraction schemes provided sufficient protection?
At Tarmac's invitation, their gravel extraction site at Bury St Edmunds had been visited by some of those attending the meeting and the 6m high banks together with tree planting were
Page 5 of 6



not considered to be effective. The trees were very small and would require 10 - 15 years growth after planting to be effective. Also they were deciduous trees and of little use in winter as a screen.

What are the options?

Clearly there is the option of objecting to planning applications to extract gravel. This should take the form of writing letters of objection to Norfolk County Council (you can copy these to the Marlpit and/or your Parish Council) stating your reasons for objecting. 85 people wrote letters of objection on the Thurning application and they were successful in achieving a rejection of the plans for gravel extraction.

Given the '7 year landbank criteria' any such letters should probably include the proviso that if such planning permission were to be granted, that the permission should include certain conditions e.g.

(i) Suitable and adequate screening measures to be provided and established before any extraction commences.
(ii) The route of lorries to and from the site is to totally avoid all villages for which lorry traffic is unsuitable and/or potentially dangerous.
(iii) Road improvements and pedestrian safety measures such would enable the safe passage of lorry traffic are to be in place before any extraction commences.

It seems obvious really, get the proper infrastructure in place before you start. However, what is obvious doesn't always mean that it becomes reality.

This is your opportunity to make sure it does.
M D

Page 6 of 6

  © Copyright 2002 all rights reserved