|

Horstead With Stanninghall Parish Council -
A Public Meeting Has Been Arranged
|
|
|
March 2002
|
|
******************************
Saturday 2nd March 2002
2.30 p.m.
Tithe Barn, Rectory Road
To Inform Parishioners
of the Proposed
Mineral (Sand/Gravel)
Extracting Schemes
Within The
Parish Boundaries
All Welcome
******************************
|
|
Page 1 of
8
|
|
|
|
Norfolk County Council Martineau Lane Norwich 11th
February, 2002.
Dear Sirs,
Ref: Proposed Tarmac gravel extraction - Stanninghall.
I note with some perplexity the fact that you would
appear to be at the point of considering an application
from Tarmac to uproot the countryside and distort
the life of the people who live in this area.
You must be aware that heavy lorry traffic through
the villages of Horstead and Coltishall will be greatly
increased and that traffic on the main Norwich arterial
road will be augmented to the point where serious
bottlenecks may occur, especially on the ring road
roundabout into Norwich.
The Horstead/Coltishall road bridge is hardly able
to keep pace with the existing traffic and is, I believe,
the subject of a weight restriction. Would you please
confirm whether this is the case and if so, what plans
you may have, commensurate with such planning proposals,
to increase this limit or to reinforce or widen the
bridge?
You have consistently refused to initiate any form
of traffic calming thought the villages concerned,
to the point where you have steadfastly ignored the
requests of the villagers to install either a zebra
crossing or a Belisha Beacon. The road through the
villages, especially opposite the Island Filling Station,
is horribly dangerous. The reason why more fatalities
or accidents have not occurred is probably more due
to the nimble footedness
|
|
Page 2 of
8
|
|
|
|
of the school children who cross there than to the
sensible driving habits of those who use the road
or your actions to protect them.
Quite apart from the impending chaos on the roads
and the extra danger that will be caused, especially
in winter, because of the inevitable increase in water
and mud. Car windscreens will become dirtier than
is normal or to be reasonably expected, leading to
dangerous driving conditions. These will be exacerbated
when freezing conditions prevail. None but the panel
beaters, not the rescue services, will thank you.
I understand that this region is a conservation area
of outstanding natural beauty, a catchment for tourists
who play a major role in the summer time economy.
Is it reasonable or sensible to justify the granting
of planning permission for such a project when it
does no good to any person living or visiting the
area in which the proposed detrimental activities
will take place?
It is interesting to note that no-one is even beating
that hackneyed old drum about reduction in unemployment.
It really does seems to me as though this entire exercise
is another example of the wishes of the many being
subjugated for the greed of a few.
The political ramifications should also be born in
mind because although the present transport minister
is in favour of new town developments, for which I
imagine Tarmac needs a lot of gravel; thereby further
contributing to the demise of the agricultural and
rustic environment; he is soon to be retired. The
political rumour is that he is to be removed; elevated
would not be the mot juste, to the Lords. The political
winds of change are afoot and if you do acquiesce
to Tarmac's proposal you will offend a great many
people both in this area and without.
|
|
Page 3 of
8
|
|
|
|
I think that you should reflect quite hard on your
decision. If you decide to grant Tarmac the permission
which they desire then you surely must have a considerable
duty of care to those living within the area to be
affected by the gravel works, its peripheral and collateral
damage as a consequence of your verdict.
There can be absolutely no point in accepting as
anything other than a load of old baloney, any assurances
given by business operators engaged in such activities
as this. It would, however, be useful to have made
public, preferably at, or before a board of enquiry,
the names and addresses and interest exposure of all
involved in Tarmac and its sidereal operators who
might stand to benefit from this proposed rural intrusion.
I hope that you will consider the pending application
from Tarmac in an unfavourable light. I would be interested
to know what liabilities might devolve on the local
authorities concerned due to accidents or mishaps
arising from such gravel extraction activities and
related consequences. We who live in these villages
will no longer be inconvenienced by local traffic;
a necessity of life, I fear; but we will find ourselves
dumped slap bang in the midst of a quarrying and construction
access system. This will lead to dangerous conditions,
reduced tourism, depressed economy, slumping house
prices and an overall degradation of local life. Would
you have this so? The act of disappointing a construction
company is not heinous. The alternative to such an
action would, I feel sure, prove to be extraordinarily
short sighted.
Yours truly,
Roderick Bromley
|
|
Page 4 of
8
|
|
|
|
Norfolk County Council County Hall
Martineau Lane Norwich
Norfolk
4th February 2002
REF: ENV/C/5/200l/5005
Dear Sir,
I wish to register my objection to the proposed sand
and gravel extraction site at Grange Farm in Horstead.
My concern is with the amount of traffic, especially
lorries, that this will undoubtedly cause.
The villages of Horstead, Buxton and Coltishall are
in conservation areas. These local roads were never
designed to take the volume of traffic they must tolerate
at the moment, and could certainly not cope with any
increase in traffic.
There are three areas of specific concern:
1. Coltishall bridge
2. The sharp left hand bend at the Island Garage
3. The High Street/Church Street section.
This will cause increased traffic congestion and
possibly result in accidents. More importantly, the
safety of pedestrians will be severely compromised,
especially at area 3.
|
|
Page 5 of
8
|
|
|
|
I do not feel that major restructuring of the roads
in question is in the best interests of these villages,
(although I do note that this has not apparently been
planned as a safety measure).
I hope that The Council and Longwater Gravel Company
Ltd. will see that, if planning permission is granted
at this site, every care is taken to ensure there
is no increase in lorry traffic through the village
of Coltishall.
I would also like to make it clear, that as a resident
of Coltishall, living on the main road where I could
particularly be affected by this proposed site, I
did not receive a letter of notification from Tarmac.
Fortunately I found out about this proposed site
through The Marlpit, the magazine for the villages
of Horstead, Coltishall and Hautbois.
Yours faithfully
Dr Suzanne Hogg
cc
Tarmac Southern Ltd.
Long water Gravel Company Ltd.
Mr Keith Simpson MP
The Eastern Daily Press
|
|
Page 6 of
8
|
|
|
|

Parish Council Meeting - 13th February 2002
Thank You - To all who responded with letters concerning
Longwater Gravel, TARMAC, and Centre Hatching in Hall
Lane/Norwich Road area. There are far too many to
acknowledge individually.
Mineral (Sand/Gravel) Extraction Schemes
Unfortunately a certain amount of confusion has arisen
owing to the close proximity of the articles on pages
7, 8, and 9 of last months Marlpit.
There are two completely separate proposals - the
first being a planning application by Longwater Gravel
at Grange Farm, Horstead - Reference No. ENV/C/2001/5005
for a ten year contract excavating 50,000 tonnes per
year, with an estimated number of 13 lorries leaving
the site each day which means 26 lorry movements per
day.
|
|
Page 7 of
8
|
|
|
|
The second is a proposal by Tarmac
on Norwich Road, Horstead - at the time of writing
(13th February, copy date for March Marlpit) Tarmac
have not made formal application although it is understood
they plan to put this forward by the end of February.
This application will be for twenty years with an
estimated number 75 lorries leaving the site each
day meaning 150 lorry movements per day.
A public meeting has been arranged
to discuss both these proposals on Saturday 2nd March
- See separate notice - Everyone is welcome - You
don't have to live in Horstead.
Queen Elizabeth II Golden Jubilee Celebrations -
We are still waiting for suggestions for celebrating
this event. How about some ideas about how you would
like to spend this special day.
Casual Vacancy for Parish Councillor - If you are
interested in being co-opted onto the parish council
please apply in writing to the address below.
Horstead Playing Field Fund - Tickets are now available
for this event - see separate notice.
Next Meeting - March 13th in the Tithe Barn as usual
Christine Roe, Clerk
Landfall, Norwich Road, Horstead. NR12 7EQ Tel: 01603
738804
|
|
|
|
|
|